Tag: Services OPS SCS

  • Des organisations du monde entier dénoncent la décision de l’Ontario de ne pas financer les sites de consommation supervisée restants

    Des organisations du monde entier dénoncent la décision de l’Ontario de ne pas financer les sites de consommation supervisée restants

    Pour publication immédiate

    Toronto, ON | March 31, 2026–Aujourd’hui, exactement un an après que le gouvernement de l’Ontario a forcé neuf sites de services de consommation et de traitement (CTS, également connus sous le nom de sites de consommation supervisée, ou SCS) à fermer à travers la province, plus de 250 organisations – dirigées par le HIV Legal Network, le Drug Strategy Network of Ontario, et la Coalition canadienne des politiques sur les drogues -. ont envoyé un message clair au gouvernement de l’Ontario. Ensemble, ils demandent au gouvernement de respecter les conseils d’experts d’organisations ayant une expérience inégalée en matière de toxicomanie, de suivre les preuves de plus en plus nombreuses démontrant le besoin évident de SCS, et de s’engager à garder les individus et les quartiers plus sûrs pour tout le monde en revenant sur la décision malavisée de supprimer les huit sites de SCS financés restants en Ontario.

    Malgré les affirmations de la province selon lesquelles la fermeture des sites CTS en mars dernier n’a causé aucun problème, les données communiquées aujourd’hui lors d’une conférence de presse mettent en évidence une tendance inquiétante : Les données à l’échelle de l’Ontario montrent une forte augmentation des appels aux services médicaux d’urgence (+69,5 %) et de l’utilisation des services d’urgence (+67 %) pour des surdoses liées aux opioïdes au cours de la période qui a suivi la fermeture forcée de neuf sites CTS en mars 2025 en vertu de la loi sur les soins communautaires et le rétablissement (Community Care and Recovery Act).

    “Ces tendances sont troublantes et justifient un examen très attentif de la part de la province”, déclare le Dr Gillian Kolla, de la Faculté de médecine de l’Université Memorial. “Le moment et l’ampleur de ces augmentations correspondent aux préoccupations soulevées au moment des fermetures au gouvernement de l’Ontario par d’innombrables experts en santé publique, y compris leurs propres conseillers internes. Le gouvernement a l’obligation de prendre ces tendances au sérieux et d’examiner le rôle qu’a pu jouer la suppression des services de consommation supervisée.”

    Dans la ville de Toronto, les appels au SAMU pour des toxicités liées aux opioïdes ont augmenté de 82 % depuis la fermeture des sites CTS, passant de 192 appels en mars 2025 à 350 appels mensuels en janvier 2026, une forte hausse conforme à ce que les experts avaient prévenu qu’il se produirait à la suite de la fermeture des sites, et en contradiction flagrante avec la tendance à la baisse qui prévalait auparavant. À Hamilton, où le CTS de la ville a fermé en avril 2025, les interventions des services médicaux d’urgence liées aux opioïdes sont passées de 66 en avril 2025 à 199 en février 2026, soit le nombre mensuel le plus élevé enregistré depuis le début de la collecte des données. Prises ensemble, ces tendances soulèvent de sérieuses inquiétudes quant à l’étude imparfaite et finalement peu concluante de la société d’État de l’Alberta récemment invoquée par le gouvernement de l’Ontario pour justifier les fermetures.

    Les huit sites restants qui seront supprimés en juin 2026 ont desservi 120 997 personnes uniques et inversé 15 402 situations d’urgence liées à des surdosesCes résultats sont le fruit de relations exceptionnelles entre clients et prestataires et d’un ensemble impressionnant de services complémentaires, notamment des soins de santé primaires, des possibilités de traitement volontaire de la toxicomanie et de la santé mentale, des soutiens sociaux spécialisés, et plus encore.

    “Ayant connu les deux côtés du système, la réduction des méfaits n’est pas théorique pour moi – elle permet de sauver des vies”, déclare Akosua Gyan-Mante. “J’ai vu de mes propres yeux comment la compassion, la dignité et l’absence de jugement peuvent maintenir les gens en vie suffisamment longtemps pour leur permettre d’accéder aux soins et de se stabiliser.”

    Il est également prouvé que les initiatives de réduction des méfaits et les SCS réduisent la charge fiscale de l’Ontario en prévenant la transmission du VIH et de l’hépatite C, entre autres avantages en termes d’économies.

    ” La fermeture de ces sites, et l’attaque plus large et illogique contre la réduction des méfaits en Ontario et dans tout le Canada, est profondément inquiétante et s’avère déjà mortelle “, déclare Sandra Ka Hon Chu, codirectrice exécutive du Réseau juridique du VIH. “Priver les sites de consommation supervisée de financement et faire pression sur les gens pour qu’ils adoptent un modèle fondé uniquement sur l’abstinence – y compris les HART Hubs – ne fonctionnera pas. La consommation supervisée est un élément clé de la réponse à la crise de notre approvisionnement en drogues toxiques et non réglementées : elle ne peut pas être remplacée”.

    “Nous encourageons vivement l’adoption de politiques en matière de drogues qui contribuent à la santé et à la sécurité des individus et des communautés, et non qui leur nuisent”, déclare Michael Parkinson, directeur général du Drug Strategy Network of Ontario. “Le gouvernement de l’Ontario a le devoir de garantir la vie, la liberté et la sécurité de tous ses résidents. Le fait de défaire intentionnellement des interventions qui ont fait leurs preuves garantit des résultats dangereux et coûteux, menaçant le soulagement que nous recherchons tous et que nous méritons.”

    Nous demandons au gouvernement de l’Ontario de respecter les preuves et de revenir immédiatement sur sa décision désastreuse de continuer à défrayer les SCS et de forcer leur fermeture pendant une urgence de santé publique d’une ampleur historique.

    -30-

    Pour consulter le dossier factuel qui présente des données sur l’impact de la fermeture de 2025 CTS en Ontario, voir Ce que disent les données probantes sur le financement des sites de consommation supervisée restants en Ontario.

    Pour plus d’informations sur la nécessité d’étendre les services de consommation supervisée à l’ensemble du Canada, veuillez consulter le site suivant Développer les services de consommation supervisée : Qu’est-ce qui a changé au Canada ?

    Contact presse
    Dylan DeMarsh – [email protected]

  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Silence from Ontario Ministry of Health as Time Runs Out to Save Supervised Consumption Sites 

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Silence from Ontario Ministry of Health as Time Runs Out to Save Supervised Consumption Sites 

    Ontario, Canada | March 18, 2024 

    Two weeks have passed since 51 groups from across Ontario sent an open letter calling on the provincial government to immediately fund and support supervised consumption sites. But despite the coalition’s request for an emergency meeting by March 13, Minister of Health Sylvia Jones and Associate Minister of Mental Health and Addictions Michael Tibollo have not responded.

    The groups are speaking out to secure emergency funding and prevent impending closures of sites in Sudbury and Timmins. More than 500 people have died from drug poisoning in Ontario so far this year. 

    “I am horrified. This is a life-and-death emergency, and we are being ignored,” says Rev. George Bozanich of the Windsor CTS Advocacy Coalition. “Without these services, Ontarians die.  These are our children, parents, siblings and neighbours. I cannot imagine the Ministers and the Premier ignoring a similar lifesaving request on any other issue.”   

    Since the current provincial government came to power in 2018, unregulated drug deaths have surged. “Toxic drugs killed nine people every day in the first two months of this year,” says Beeta Senedjani of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition. “The dead would fill every seat on at least eleven school buses. This is an emergency. The province needs to start acting like it.”   

    Supervised consumption sites are a proven health intervention where trained staff respond to overdose emergencies and offer supports and connections to health and social services. Evidence consistently shows the sites save lives and significantly reduce emergency calls and hospital visits.  

    “The province’s actions have put municipal governments, local health boards and even the public in the impossible position of having to either foot the bill for a provincial responsibility or watch their communities suffer,” says Matthew Shoemaker, Mayor of Sault Ste. Marie. “This crisis is a foremost challenge for municipalities, who don’t have the resources or the mandate to fund health care. We badly need stable support and action from the Government of Ontario and we need it now.”  

    “The entire years-long process has been an irresponsible use of public funds,” says Michael Brennan of Pozitive Pathways in Windsor, whose site was forced to close in December. “Supervised consumption sites are a proven lifesaving intervention that reduce costs and burdens across our public systems, on police, paramedics and emergency departments. We have complied with every requirement.  We cannot wait any longer.” 

    Last fall, the Province of Ontario put all supervised consumption site applications on indefinite hold pending a critical incident review for one site in Toronto. The decision came after a bystander was tragically killed in the vicinity of a Toronto site last summer.  

    “A lengthy review of a tragic, isolated incident is preventing desperate communities across the province from implementing lifesaving services amidst a public health emergency,” says Michael Parkinson of the Drug Strategy Network of Ontario. “Critical incidents occur frequently in other settings, such as hospitals. But they never result in freezing funding or site approvals.”  

    Several communities have waited for approval since long before the review. Barrie and Sudbury applied over two years ago. Citing the province’s pause, a Hamilton application was withdrawn after two years. In Sault Ste Marie, a site application is instead being directed to the federal government. Windsor’s only site shut its doors at the end of December after waiting over a year. Without immediate provincial funding, sites in Sudbury and Timmins will close in two weeks. 

    “When I think about losing Safe Health Site Timmins, I am afraid for our community,” says Jason Sereda of DIY Community Health in Timmins. “We are running out of time.” Premier Doug Ford has said the review results will be released this month, too late for those who have already died of drug poisoning. 

    The open letter calls for the elimination of unnecessary barriers and immediate sustained provincial funding for supervised consumption sites, including inhalation services, to meet the urgent needs of communities. The coalition emphasizes that these demands require immediate provincial action to prevent further loss of life and harm to communities across Ontario. 

    “Minister Jones, please listen to us. This is an emergency,” says Amber Fritz of Réseau ACCESS Network in Sudbury. “We need your leadership. You have a choice: you have the opportunity to save lives and costs to the system, or you can continue to do nothing. If our loved ones die, that will be your legacy.”   

    -30- 

    Documents and links available: 

    • Open Letter 
    • [Recording] March 5 2024 Online Briefing on Open Letter RE: Ontario Supervised Consumption Services with speakers from the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, Pozitive Pathways in Windsor, Reseau ACCESS in Sudbury, Safe Health Site in Timmins and the Drug Strategy Network of Ontario.  

    Media Contact: 

    Jessica Hannon for the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition [contact to arrange interviews]

  • COVID-19: Responding to  Overdoses in OPS and SCS

    COVID-19: Responding to Overdoses in OPS and SCS

    responding to overdoses during covid responding to overdoses during covid

    “The context of BC’s dual public health emergencies related to the toxic drug supply and the COVID-19 pandemic requires providing access to harm reduction services including overdose prevention services (OPS) and supervised consumption services (SCS) while maintaining measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This document provides guidance on responding to illicit drug poisonings or overdoses in OPS/SCS settings, where there will be a need for flexibility and consideration of the facility, staff training and available resources when implementing public health guidelines for preventing the spread of COVID-19.”

    Click HERE for more COVID-19 resources

  • Reducing transmission of respiratory illness through improved indoor air quality

    Reducing transmission of respiratory illness through improved indoor air quality

    Improving ventilation for covid-19 Improving ventilation for covid-19

    “The following is an edited summary of a conversation with Dr. Jeffrey Siegel, Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Toronto. Dr. Siegel is an expert on indoor air quality and ventilation. The conversation took place in late December, 2020. Some information was also added following the conversation by MAP.

    Respiratory illnesses like COVID-19 are spread in a few ways, including through the air. When people are together indoors, infections can spread more easily. But there are things you can do to improve indoor air quality and help reduce transmission. While this is particularly urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic, improvements to indoor air quality are important long-term investments at any time. For example, these improvements can help reduce transmission of long-standing respiratory illnesses such as flu and tuberculosis.

    Please note, the below focuses on airborne transmission, and does not address or replace other infection control measures such as masks, hand washing and the disinfection of surfaces.”

    Click HERE for more COVID-19 resources

  • Overdose prevention and response during COVID-19

    Overdose prevention and response during COVID-19

    Overdose prevention and response during COVID-19, Overdose prevention and response during COVID-19


    Click HERE for more resources

  • Syringe services program operational changes during COVID-19 outbreak

    Syringe services program operational changes during COVID-19 outbreak

    Syringe services program changes during COVID-19, Syringe services program changes during COVID-19,

    Click HERE for more resources

    “Syringe services program (SSP) operational changes during the COVID-19 global outbreak. Syringe services programs (SSPs) are community-based programs that offer tailored social and medical services to PWID, including access to sterile and clean injection equipment, onsite and referrals to sub- stance use treatment, HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) testing, and overdose prevention through naloxone distribution. Currently, there are over 400 SSP locations across the United States (US) providing life-saving care to PWID. However, with the unprecedented developments regarding COVID-19, service delivery may be severely disrupted, and operational changes may be imperative to protect SSP staff and to ensure continuity of services. We provide preliminary data regarding SSP operational and service delivery changes during the US’ response to the COVID-19 global pandemic and provide key policy and service provision im- plications for SSPs.”

    Source: International Journal of Drug Policy

  • Supporting people who use drugs in acute care settings during COVID-19

    Supporting people who use drugs in acute care settings during COVID-19

    supporting people who use drugs in acute care, supporting people who use drugs in acute care


    Click HERE for more resources

    “This document is one of a series of six national guidance documents, rapidly developed by the CRISM network at the request of the Government of Canada. Collectively, the six documents address urgent needs of people who use drugs, service providers, and decision makers in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. The urgent nature of this work required rapid development and dissemination of this guidance. This, and the continuing evolution of the knowledge base regarding COVID-19, precluded CRISM from conducting a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. However, when available, scientific evidence is cited in support of the expert advice offered herein.

    The guidance provided in this document is subject to change as new information becomes available. Readers should note that the intent of this document is to provide general guidance rather than detailed procedural and logistical advice. Readers are advised to consult local Public Health and medical authorities for specific input on navigating their own unique regulatory and policy environments, as necessary.”

    Source: CRISM

  • Harm Reduction and COVID-19 Guidance for Service Providers

    Harm Reduction and COVID-19 Guidance for Service Providers

    Alberta health services covid guidance, Alberta health services covid guidance


    Click HERE for more resources

    “This guidance document for community service providers was prepared by the Alberta Health Services (AHS) Harm Reduction Services Team in partnership with the Alberta Community Council on HIV (ACCH). It covers information on how community services may alter harm reduction practices during the COVID-19 pandemic with the goal of reducing the spread of COVID-19. This information can also be used by service providers to communicate information and education on reducing spread of COVID-19 while maintaining health and wellness along the spectrum of substance use.”

  • Strategies for a gender-inclusive response to COVID-19

    Strategies for a gender-inclusive response to COVID-19

    gender inclusive response to covid 19

    gender inclusive response to covid 19

    Click HERE for more resources

    “Public health strategies aimed at preventing the spread of COVID-19, including physical distancing, frequent hand washing, and self-isolation, impact all of us, and in particular, the marginalized communities that we work with. As we continue to work with community stakeholders to integrate these strategies, it is important to also integrate strategies that address the existing social determinants of health that impact WHAI’s priority populations of women (women living with HIV, African, Caribbean and Black [ACB] women including newcomers, Indigenous women, Trans women, women who use substances, women who experience violence, and women who are or have been incarcerated). Below are some considerations that have arisen to date.”

    Source: Women & HIV/AIDS Initiative